Production Manager Essay

Dawns Train of notion Process Chart performanceThought1. Before clash the Sales Representativei. Objective of Meeting to address whether it is best to bargain for additional equipment accessories.ii. What lead the thickening big businessman record about if I sink to buy or non to buy?iii. I never made mistake in buying the equipment possibly my boss will trust me whatever I decide on the meeting.2. Meeting the Sales Representative Video Presentation.i. He looks ready, maybe he has a good point.ii. Okay, he comes prep atomic number 18d with the television system.iii. The points are okay, serious do I need that right now?iv. Maybe it is expensive, just by the look at the video.3. later on the Videoi. How much will that cost us?ii. Okay, it seems a good cost-benefit offer.iii. But what will my boss think of me if I decide to buy?iv. I just bought this equipment. buttocks I justify it?v. Okay, Ill take jeopardy any look benefits exceed the cost.vi. Ill just explain to the boss.vii. Okay, I will get and buy that accessory.What factors would have led Dawn to come to a several(predicate) finding?Here are the factors that could have altered Dawns conclusiveness (i) The Sales Representative is late (2) The boss is not satisfied with the underway equipment (3) The company is under cost-pressure (4) The boss and Dawn is not in a good relationship (5) The Sales representative is not well refined (6) The Sales representative did not prepare a flashy video and (6) The Sales Representative could not justify the cost versus benefits.ActivityThought1. Before Meeting the Sales Representativei. Objective of Meeting to discuss whether it is best to buy additional equipment accessories.ii. What will the boss might say about if I decide to buy when the equipment is not achieving its purpose.iii. How can I face the boss, this might be another wrong decision to add-up with our electric current status.2. Meeting the Sales Representative Video Presentation.i. H es late. I have many things to do.ii. The video is lame. I have much give away things to do.iii. I dont think we need it at all.3. After the VideoIn this case, even before the meeting, Dawn has already stop thinking whether to buy or not to buy because in the warmness of the meeting he has already decided.What do you believe are the implications of shut in on our judgments and on our attempts to influence others? Are t here(predicate) moral considerations? wherefore or why not?Manufacturing, business, even life and death decisions depends on how information is trapd. However there is supposedly no problem with shape because it provides us confidence to convince people to buy, to believe, to be happy or to be sad, as long as our ulterior motive is good. shape itself is not the problemevery piece of information communicated requires a frame to convey message clearly. The problem is a larger social hack which is usually done by the government, corporation, and individuals who w ant to deceive people in believing something else. Example, in the medical industry, hospitals or doctors might release statements that are framed in such a way to fool people.A few years ago, British women were informed that the use of the contraceptive oral contraceptive pill leads to a 2-fold increase in the risk of thrombo-embolism. Many stopped pickings the pill, which resulted in unwanted pregnancies and abortions. If the official statement had instead been that the pill increases the risk from 1 to 2 in 14,000 women, few women would have been scared. The problem here is that it framed in a general statement not show any evidence or numerical study results. A tie of moral issues in these wrong framing incidents are happening day-by-day in our television. Media in their attempt to get higher rating tends to blab a story and framed the headlines in such a way that people will be intrigue to watch. It often results to a different decision and perception of things aside from that which is supposed to be true.REFERENCE careenFrege, G. The Thought A Logical Inquiry. Mind, New Series, Vol. 65, No. 259. July, 1956. October 10, 2008. From http//links.jstor.orgGigerenzer, Gerd, MD. ( ) Why Does border Influence Judgment? Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 18, exhaust 11. October 10, 2008 from http//www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/fulltext/118885195/PDFSTARTRieber R. (Interviewer). Dialogues on the Psychology of Language and Thought Plenum (Transcript. 1983.Schweighardt, C. Thought Process make up for Six Sigma What, Why and How. Isixsigma Website. 2000. October 10, 2008.